Spindle Law Blog

Author Archive

Multiple Jurisdictions

July 29th, 2010 by David Gold

In areas in which the law tends to share a common structure across multiple jurisdictions, we like to put authorities for different jurisdictions together.  Take a look, for example, at the evidence law rule in some jurisdictions that there is a social worker-client privilege and, on the other hand, the rule of some other jurisdictions that there is no such privilege.  (You have to sign in first to see what I’m talking about.)

This makes it easy for researchers in the law of one jurisdiction to see how courts in other jurisdictions have addressed the same issues.

Will Lawyers Share?

July 18th, 2010 by David Gold

Will lawyers really reveal what they know about the law if they can’t send somebody a bill for it—possibly for every tenth of an hour of it? It’s a fair question that reasonably occurs to some people when they hear about Spindle Law. When you look more closely, though, you realize that, in a project full of experiments, this is one place where we aren’t breaking new ground.

Lawyers have a long and varied tradition of sharing analysis of the law in public ways for reasons other than a paycheck. A fairly new instance is the proliferation of law blogs we write for—our own blogs, other people’s blogs, blogs run by law firms, by private companies, by non-profits, you name it. Older examples include writing for print bar publications, teaching and making presentations for legal associations, and many others.

Why do lawyers give away their expert knowledge? Because they get more out of it that way, professionally and personally, than they would by reserving every insight for paying customers. Demonstrating expertise helps lawyers generate business through referrals and makes them more attractive to potential employers, for example. Many also find it intellectually satisfying or enjoy the interaction with those learning from them.

At Spindle Law we’re hard at work to create an environment that rewards contributors richly in many ways. It’s a brand new kind of environment, but if we get it right, lawyers will contribute for all the same old reasons they always have.

Lawyerist Review

July 13th, 2010 by David Gold

“Spindle Law is unlike any research method you learned in school. To me, it is a backwards (read: totally intuitive) way of drilling into legal rules and finding the authorities to support them.”

Please go read the whole of Laura Bergus’s wonderful review on Lawyerist this morning. Then, please return to Spindle Law, sign in, and share a bit of what you know about the law. As the review says, you “can use Spindle Law as an outlining tool for any legal topic, as well as a way to track and store research for memo- and brief-writing projects. All while contributing to the site to make it more useful for others.”

If you think you might like to contribute to the site but aren’t sure how to get started, please email us.  As I mentioned in my podcast conversation with Laura on Legal Geekery, we’re excited to be just getting started on a section on civil procedure.  If that’s something you know something about, whether you’re an experienced litigator or a thoughtful law student, please mention that specifically.  If you have another area in mind, please mention that.  If you don’t have a specific area in mind, that’s great, too.