Spindle Law Blog

Author Archive

Welcome, Professor Kyu Ho Youm, Our Media Law Chief Editor

November 15th, 2010 by David Gold

I am extremely pleased to announce that Professor Kyu Ho Youm will be the chief editor of a new Spindle Law module on media law.  Professor Youm holds the Jonathan Marshall First Amendment Chair at the University of Oregon, where he teaches in the School of Journalism and Communication.  His is a prolific scholar, whose research interests include U.S. communication law, press freedom theories, legal research and writing (an area we have a special fondness for around here), international and comparative media law, and digital freedom.   His work has been published in law journals, as well as other periodicals and books, in the United States and elsewhere, and has been cited by courts around the world.  For much more about him and his work, see his university faculty bio.

I know that Professor Youm is interested in hearing from members of the Spindle Law community who would like to participate in building the media law module.  If you’re one, let us know, and we’ll put you in touch.

Follow

October 31st, 2010 by David Gold

Joel just updated the site with a new feature that allows you to follow the activity in an area of law in Spindle Law.  Just roll over the text of any branch in the tree (on the page for that branch) and click “follow.”  After confirming, you’ll be signed up to receive an email notification whenever anyone adds to, edits, comments on, vouches for, rejects, or nominates for deletion that branch, its authorities, its descendant branches, or their authorities.  Whenever you contribute yourself, you follow by default  (but can decline to follow by unchecking a check box, and can always unfollow), so you’ll be able to keep up on everything that’s happening in that section.

Multiple Jurisdictions

July 29th, 2010 by David Gold

In areas in which the law tends to share a common structure across multiple jurisdictions, we like to put authorities for different jurisdictions together.  Take a look, for example, at the evidence law rule in some jurisdictions that there is a social worker-client privilege and, on the other hand, the rule of some other jurisdictions that there is no such privilege.  (You have to sign in first to see what I’m talking about.)

This makes it easy for researchers in the law of one jurisdiction to see how courts in other jurisdictions have addressed the same issues.